JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 18, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Jose Alfredo Garcia Merchan

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaracion Auto De La Corte Constitucional
  • Se niega solicitud por no contener una suficiente carga argumentativa que demuestre la existencia de “verdaderas dudas o ambigüedades” en el Auto
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración del Auto 294/15.

Considera la Sala de Revisión que la petición formulada no contiene una suficiente carga argumentativa que demuestre la existencia de verdaderas dudas o ambigüedades en la providencia que se solicita aclarar, mediante la cual se decretaron medidas provisionales en el proceso de la referencia.

Se DENIEGA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaración del Auto No. 294 de 2015 proferido por la Corte Constitucional, presentada por el señor José Alfredo García Merchán.
  2. Segundo. NOTIFICAR al señor José Alfredo García Merchán del contenido de la presente providencia4.
  3. Tercero. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.